CFE로고
정보
네트워크
교육
FreeTube
오디오클립
도서
CFE 소개
ENG Facebook YouTube search

Real estate regulations for no one

최승노 / 2021-02-22 / 조회: 5,039       The Korea Times

Property right is vital in the functioning of market economy; without the guarantee of the right to property, the idea of market economy cannot be established. However, the government is now performing a conjoint attack with the media on property rights ― with all kinds of taxes and regulations. This phenomenon is at best dismantling the very base of the market economy, and plainly wrong.


The current real estate policies are misled with the wrong understanding of what it means to buy and sell houses. To stabilize the real estate price is basically to stabilize the market itself. Nevertheless, the rhetoric of house "pricing" deluded the government.


It eventually had the government and its policies lose their grip on the basic principle of stabilizing the housing "market" itself. Price which has been formed under the natural balance between supply and demand were then artificially manipulated. It only triggered greater chaos in not only the market but also the price which was the origin of the delusion.


House price can never be the target. Stability in the market can only be achieved through natural balance between the supply and demand. The results that participants in the market can eventually benefit from and be satisfied with, are possible so. Yet, the government formed a strict boundary in which the supply and demand can be met.


Such unnatural force pushed and pulled the unwilling buyers and sellers in the market, stirring up even greater instability. Instability then transcends into vulnerability and changeability in the market and its participants. Through such course, real estate policies brought about diverse balloon effects and unnecessary competition in the pricing within the market.


What is required now is to reduce the margin of doubt in the price and stabilize housing prices. Quality housing should be supplied into the market across the country, not only in Seoul. Rather than suppressing inevitable demand forcefully, timely supply to meet the demand in existence is a sound policy-making and governance.


The chaos of late in the house market is founded upon an irony. The government and its policies are based on misinterpretation of speculators and lack of supply in housing. If the former were in effect and to be handled, demands for speculations should have been diversified in other regions outside of the Seoul.


If the latter, extra supply of housing in regions of greater price should have been in action. Nevertheless, what the government chose was to press down the existing demand and pump in unwanted supply. This hastened the influx of speculators and getting an affordable housing in Seoul has now become near fantasy.


Seoul is a megacity with half of the nation's population in and out of it. Many jobs in both public and private sector are circled around it. Invisible yet immense value of the region cannot be simply reduced to "single adequate price." Blaming speculators for the rise of pricing in the market is a wrong decision and scapegoating.


If the government were serious to put down the price, reasonable and sound real estate policies based on the full understanding of such reality should have been in place. However, intellectual laziness and a sense of moral superiority had them demonize people wanting to make home in Seoul, which had all the means and reasons to attract them.


If stabilized and rational real estate price is to be achieved, excessive regulations in the market are to be removed and policies in coordination with market principles should be introduced. Supply should be met in regions of higher demand with good quality. Only through such policy direction and its effect, real estate market can function in a way to better our lives.


This is the direct opposite of what the government is currently pursuing, but people in demands and their needs can only be satisfied and met with the total shift of attitude and action. Government should step out of long delusion of controlling and picking out speculators out of the market. Experimentalism and obsession with regulatory schemes have already proven themselves wrong a long time ago.


Wrong policies coming from wrong diagnosis can never produce a meaningful result. Demonizing residence in Seoul in turn resulted in the rise of price in Seoul housing market. Conflicts and envies were worsened in such atmosphere.


Only the supply of affordable quality housing can be a solution to this chaos. Having to worry about the residence all the time can never be a fruitful and prosperous life. Real estate should be a mean to catalyze products of good quality into the market continuously, which will eventually make people's lives more stable and happier.



Choi Sung-no is president of the Center for Free Enterprise.

       

▲ TOP

NO. 제 목 글쓴이 등록일자
188 [자유발언대] 복지정책, 미래 세대 부담은 이제 그만
이진서 / 2021-12-03
이진서 2021-12-03
187 대기업에 대한 반감이 부르는 폐해는 크다
최승노 / 2021-12-01
최승노 2021-12-01
186 일하는 자에게는 복이 넘치나니
최승노 / 2021-11-26
최승노 2021-11-26
185 [자유발언대] 핀테크 기업의 규제, 역주행과 다름없다
고강은 / 2021-11-26
고강은 2021-11-26
184 중고차 시장에도 대기업 브랜드가 필요하다
곽은경 / 2021-11-23
곽은경 2021-11-23
183 무리한 탄소중립 계획 재검토해야
최승노 / 2021-10-25
최승노 2021-10-25
182 ESG경영, 규제가 아닌 제도적 뒷받침 필요
곽은경 / 2021-10-07
곽은경 2021-10-07
181 [자유발언대] 퇴직연금 수익률 높이려면 제도 개선해야
박정민 / 2021-10-07
박정민 2021-10-07
180 [자유발언대] 정치세력화된 노조, 올바른 방향성 찾아야
예혁준 / 2021-09-30
예혁준 2021-09-30
179 성급한 정년연장 요구
최승노 / 2021-09-16
최승노 2021-09-16
178 기업이 ESG에 부응하려면
곽은경 / 2021-09-10
곽은경 2021-09-10
177 [자유발언대] 이젠 `주택의 질`을 생각할 때
이선혜 / 2021-09-02
이선혜 2021-09-02
176 [자유발언대] 재원 한정된 재난지원금 선택과 집중을
표윤선 / 2021-08-27
표윤선 2021-08-27
175 지금 국회가 해야 할 일
최승노 / 2021-08-16
최승노 2021-08-16
174 [자유발언대] 대한민국 양궁은 `신화?` ...공정 경쟁의 성과
정승현 / 2021-08-12
정승현 2021-08-12