Real estate regulations for no one

최승노 / 2021-02-22 / 조회: 13,271       The Korea Times

Property right is vital in the functioning of market economy; without the guarantee of the right to property, the idea of market economy cannot be established. However, the government is now performing a conjoint attack with the media on property rights ― with all kinds of taxes and regulations. This phenomenon is at best dismantling the very base of the market economy, and plainly wrong.


The current real estate policies are misled with the wrong understanding of what it means to buy and sell houses. To stabilize the real estate price is basically to stabilize the market itself. Nevertheless, the rhetoric of house "pricing" deluded the government.


It eventually had the government and its policies lose their grip on the basic principle of stabilizing the housing "market" itself. Price which has been formed under the natural balance between supply and demand were then artificially manipulated. It only triggered greater chaos in not only the market but also the price which was the origin of the delusion.


House price can never be the target. Stability in the market can only be achieved through natural balance between the supply and demand. The results that participants in the market can eventually benefit from and be satisfied with, are possible so. Yet, the government formed a strict boundary in which the supply and demand can be met.


Such unnatural force pushed and pulled the unwilling buyers and sellers in the market, stirring up even greater instability. Instability then transcends into vulnerability and changeability in the market and its participants. Through such course, real estate policies brought about diverse balloon effects and unnecessary competition in the pricing within the market.


What is required now is to reduce the margin of doubt in the price and stabilize housing prices. Quality housing should be supplied into the market across the country, not only in Seoul. Rather than suppressing inevitable demand forcefully, timely supply to meet the demand in existence is a sound policy-making and governance.


The chaos of late in the house market is founded upon an irony. The government and its policies are based on misinterpretation of speculators and lack of supply in housing. If the former were in effect and to be handled, demands for speculations should have been diversified in other regions outside of the Seoul.


If the latter, extra supply of housing in regions of greater price should have been in action. Nevertheless, what the government chose was to press down the existing demand and pump in unwanted supply. This hastened the influx of speculators and getting an affordable housing in Seoul has now become near fantasy.


Seoul is a megacity with half of the nation's population in and out of it. Many jobs in both public and private sector are circled around it. Invisible yet immense value of the region cannot be simply reduced to "single adequate price." Blaming speculators for the rise of pricing in the market is a wrong decision and scapegoating.


If the government were serious to put down the price, reasonable and sound real estate policies based on the full understanding of such reality should have been in place. However, intellectual laziness and a sense of moral superiority had them demonize people wanting to make home in Seoul, which had all the means and reasons to attract them.


If stabilized and rational real estate price is to be achieved, excessive regulations in the market are to be removed and policies in coordination with market principles should be introduced. Supply should be met in regions of higher demand with good quality. Only through such policy direction and its effect, real estate market can function in a way to better our lives.


This is the direct opposite of what the government is currently pursuing, but people in demands and their needs can only be satisfied and met with the total shift of attitude and action. Government should step out of long delusion of controlling and picking out speculators out of the market. Experimentalism and obsession with regulatory schemes have already proven themselves wrong a long time ago.


Wrong policies coming from wrong diagnosis can never produce a meaningful result. Demonizing residence in Seoul in turn resulted in the rise of price in Seoul housing market. Conflicts and envies were worsened in such atmosphere.


Only the supply of affordable quality housing can be a solution to this chaos. Having to worry about the residence all the time can never be a fruitful and prosperous life. Real estate should be a mean to catalyze products of good quality into the market continuously, which will eventually make people's lives more stable and happier.



Choi Sung-no is president of the Center for Free Enterprise.

       

▲ TOP

NO. 제 목 글쓴이 등록일자
312 무리한 정년연장 법제화는 안돼
최승노 / 2024-11-26
최승노 2024-11-26
311 무리한 정년연장 법제화는 안돼
최승노 / 2024-11-26
최승노 2024-11-26
310 [시장경제칼럼] 이제는 청년과의 동반성장을 모색해야 할 때
곽은경 / 2024-11-04
곽은경 2024-11-04
309 온누리상품권의 허와 실
최승노 / 2024-10-30
최승노 2024-10-30
308 한강의 ‘기적’은 ‘한강의 기적’ 덕에 가능했다
안재욱 / 2024-10-27
안재욱 2024-10-27
307 노년 재산 줄이는 나쁜 제도를 개혁해야
최승노 / 2024-10-04
최승노 2024-10-04
306 기업 정서 해소에 기업 적극 나서야
안재욱 / 2024-09-29
안재욱 2024-09-29
305 기본소득은 강제 배급이다
최승노 / 2024-09-13
최승노 2024-09-13
304 성장 막는 관치금융 이젠 청산해야
안재욱 / 2024-09-09
안재욱 2024-09-09
303 사회주의 정책은 왜 양극화를 심화시키나
최승노 / 2024-08-08
최승노 2024-08-08
302 전기차 충전시설 강제하지 말아야
최승노 / 2024-08-07
최승노 2024-08-07
301 올바른 저출산 대책을 기대한다
최승노 / 2024-07-12
최승노 2024-07-12
300 환경광신주의에서 벗어나라
최승노 / 2024-06-13
최승노 2024-06-13
299 ‘남미행 급행열차’를 타지 않으려면
안재욱 / 2024-05-07
안재욱 2024-05-07
298 국민연금 개악 시도 중단해야
최승노 / 2024-04-29
최승노 2024-04-29