No glory, only scars

곽은경 / 2020-08-12 / 조회: 11,530       The Korea Times

Diplomatic tension between Korea and Japan is once again escalating. On Aug. 4, a public announcement by the Korean judiciary was made regarding the effectuation of a seizure order regarding the assets of Nippon Steel. In response, the Japanese steelmaker appealed the order.


About a year ago, the Supreme Court here ruled that Nippon Steel should compensate surviving Korean workers for their forced labor before and during World War II. Various legal disputes arose, and Nippon Steel refused to accept the decision. Now, the Korean judiciary is moving forward with the ruling by seizing the assets of the company on Korean soil.


The Japanese government insists that the right to claim reparations was ended with the 1965 treaty normalizing diplomatic relations between the two countries. Although there are several legal issues that need to be addressed, the problem at hand is way more complicated than just a ruling and an appeal.


The ruling saw the Japanese government withdraw preferential treatment for Korean companies buying key raw materials for semiconductor production. Korean consumers boycotted Japanese products in return. This conflict later went on to become a so-called "trade war" between Korea and Japan.


Matters of national pride often put a country's economy at stake. The current saga happening in Northeast Asia is not any different. Japan's decision to take Korea off its "White List" only seems to have backfired for both Seoul and Tokyo.


The export of raw materials for semiconductor production from Japan to Korea dropped by 27.9 percent. Korea struggled to find a replacement for the regulated Japanese items such as hydrogen fluoride, and the opportunity cost spent to overcome the risk has been vast.


It is too apparent that there has been no winner in this trade war, and it is easy to forecast that there will be none in the future. Both Korea and Japan are biting the bullet, the former clinging to revenge for the past and the latter stubbornly sticking to its guns.


Korea's economy depends heavily on global trade. More than 60 percent of its GDP comes from international trade. Its market, therefore, is very much affected by the tides of diplomacy. Many enterprises suffered from a Chinese whim concerning the deployment of a U.S. anti-missile system called THAAD on Korean soil.


The peninsula has also become a pig in the middle of the chaos of the fierce trade war between the U.S. and China. Its stock market fluctuates depending on how foreign investors make up their minds. The minimization of liability is crucial to induce economic growth and attract overseas funds. There should not be any room for national pride when the interests of a country's people are at stake.


Japan also cannot escape heavy criticism for its decision in a similar context. It has been well-known that ever since his inauguration, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and his cabinet have brought old reasons for conflict with Korea into the public realm for their political advantage.


Nationalism has been a useful agenda for the conservative administration to draw polls and votes. Apart from the stability of the regime, the losses and damage done to private enterprises and the people have been left for them to take care of.


In both countries, decisions were made by governments, but it was up to the market and its participants ― their very own people ― to make amends and recover. Whom are they to hold responsible for all these lost benefits, and the opportunity costs?


In a free-market economy, there are only winners. Both the seller and the buyer acquire satisfaction for their individual needs. It is only mere intuition that Japan will be jeopardized by the boycotting of Japanese goods here. The boycotting of a product leads to the boycotting of its buyer's needs and satisfaction.


Korean businesses' long hard strides to find an alternative source for hydrogen fluoride and a drastic increase in online purchases for Japanese clothing brands such as SPA and UNIQLO are good examples of such phenomena. Trade is performed under the spirit of mutual benefit, and it is the same for relations between nations.


Therefore, diplomatic matters should be resolved under the spirit of mutual amicability and respect for the people of both countries. Only when we place priority on the utility of people, can both countries then turn their heads to the future. The longer this conflict continues, the more significant the burden is to the market, and the more the people in it have to suffer.


For many of the "good years," Korea and Japan had been sharing the common value of free democracy and the free market, putting the tragic past behind them. The intertwined value chains they created were far greater than many could possibly imagine.


A brand-new attitude is of absolute necessity, not only to resolve the conflict, but mainly for the benefit of their people and their economies. Far beyond the battle for pride between nations ― and the redemption of old rights ― awaits a mutual economic bond of two Eastern powers.


Kwack Eun-kyoung (rollypop55@gmail.com) is secretary general of the Center for Free Enterprise (CFE). The views expressed in the above article are the author's own and do not reflect the editorial direction of The Korea Times.

       

▲ TOP

NO. 제 목 글쓴이 등록일자
189 아이들이 갇혀있다, 교육권력의 담장을 허물라
최승노 / 2022-05-16
최승노 2022-05-16
188 대만이 한국을 추월한 이유
최승노 / 2022-05-09
최승노 2022-05-09
187 윤석열 정부는 법치의 시대를 열어라
최승노 / 2022-05-03
최승노 2022-05-03
186 갈등비용 크다고 현실과 타협하면 ‘야합’
최승노 / 2022-04-25
최승노 2022-04-25
185 Posner의 `법경제학` 경제적 분석으로 법리·법규정의 사회적 영향력 판단
정기화 / 2022-04-19
정기화 2022-04-19
184 ‘지방균형발전’의 블랙홀에서 벗어나야
최승노 / 2022-04-18
최승노 2022-04-18
183 민간주도 싱크탱크는 ‘건강한 나침반’
최승노 / 2022-04-11
최승노 2022-04-11
182 ‘본점 이전’ 산업은행, 민영화가 올바른 해답
최승노 / 2022-04-05
최승노 2022-04-05
181 오늘은 세금해방일
최승노 / 2022-04-05
최승노 2022-04-05
180 치킨 값 원가 공개, 누구를 위한 것인가
최승노 / 2022-03-29
최승노 2022-03-29
179 다시 지식의 시대로 나아가야
최승노 / 2022-03-22
최승노 2022-03-22
178 국민에게, 기업에게 선택할 자유를 되돌려줘라
최승노 / 2022-03-15
최승노 2022-03-15
177 사회주의는 자본주의 대안이 아니다, AI도 못한다
최승노 / 2022-03-08
최승노 2022-03-08
176 경제 성장 위해 기업 규제 풀어야
최승노 / 2022-03-03
최승노 2022-03-03
175 실패한 일회용 컵 보증금제 다시 실험하겠다니
최승노 / 2022-03-01
최승노 2022-03-01