Real estate regulations for no one

최승노 / 2021-02-22 / 조회: 11,188       The Korea Times

Property right is vital in the functioning of market economy; without the guarantee of the right to property, the idea of market economy cannot be established. However, the government is now performing a conjoint attack with the media on property rights ― with all kinds of taxes and regulations. This phenomenon is at best dismantling the very base of the market economy, and plainly wrong.


The current real estate policies are misled with the wrong understanding of what it means to buy and sell houses. To stabilize the real estate price is basically to stabilize the market itself. Nevertheless, the rhetoric of house "pricing" deluded the government.


It eventually had the government and its policies lose their grip on the basic principle of stabilizing the housing "market" itself. Price which has been formed under the natural balance between supply and demand were then artificially manipulated. It only triggered greater chaos in not only the market but also the price which was the origin of the delusion.


House price can never be the target. Stability in the market can only be achieved through natural balance between the supply and demand. The results that participants in the market can eventually benefit from and be satisfied with, are possible so. Yet, the government formed a strict boundary in which the supply and demand can be met.


Such unnatural force pushed and pulled the unwilling buyers and sellers in the market, stirring up even greater instability. Instability then transcends into vulnerability and changeability in the market and its participants. Through such course, real estate policies brought about diverse balloon effects and unnecessary competition in the pricing within the market.


What is required now is to reduce the margin of doubt in the price and stabilize housing prices. Quality housing should be supplied into the market across the country, not only in Seoul. Rather than suppressing inevitable demand forcefully, timely supply to meet the demand in existence is a sound policy-making and governance.


The chaos of late in the house market is founded upon an irony. The government and its policies are based on misinterpretation of speculators and lack of supply in housing. If the former were in effect and to be handled, demands for speculations should have been diversified in other regions outside of the Seoul.


If the latter, extra supply of housing in regions of greater price should have been in action. Nevertheless, what the government chose was to press down the existing demand and pump in unwanted supply. This hastened the influx of speculators and getting an affordable housing in Seoul has now become near fantasy.


Seoul is a megacity with half of the nation's population in and out of it. Many jobs in both public and private sector are circled around it. Invisible yet immense value of the region cannot be simply reduced to "single adequate price." Blaming speculators for the rise of pricing in the market is a wrong decision and scapegoating.


If the government were serious to put down the price, reasonable and sound real estate policies based on the full understanding of such reality should have been in place. However, intellectual laziness and a sense of moral superiority had them demonize people wanting to make home in Seoul, which had all the means and reasons to attract them.


If stabilized and rational real estate price is to be achieved, excessive regulations in the market are to be removed and policies in coordination with market principles should be introduced. Supply should be met in regions of higher demand with good quality. Only through such policy direction and its effect, real estate market can function in a way to better our lives.


This is the direct opposite of what the government is currently pursuing, but people in demands and their needs can only be satisfied and met with the total shift of attitude and action. Government should step out of long delusion of controlling and picking out speculators out of the market. Experimentalism and obsession with regulatory schemes have already proven themselves wrong a long time ago.


Wrong policies coming from wrong diagnosis can never produce a meaningful result. Demonizing residence in Seoul in turn resulted in the rise of price in Seoul housing market. Conflicts and envies were worsened in such atmosphere.


Only the supply of affordable quality housing can be a solution to this chaos. Having to worry about the residence all the time can never be a fruitful and prosperous life. Real estate should be a mean to catalyze products of good quality into the market continuously, which will eventually make people's lives more stable and happier.



Choi Sung-no is president of the Center for Free Enterprise.

       

▲ TOP

NO. 제 목 글쓴이 등록일자
207 원칙 있는 정책이어야 신뢰 회복
김성준 / 2022-08-23
김성준 2022-08-23
206 시장경제에 대한 확신 있어야
이성구 / 2022-08-23
이성구 2022-08-23
205 국민이 대통령에게 바라는 것은?
박명호 / 2022-08-23
박명호 2022-08-23
204 공정거래법상 동일인 적용범위를 가족으로 축소해야
곽은경 / 2022-08-15
곽은경 2022-08-15
203 대통령의 책이 궁금하다
최승노 / 2022-08-04
최승노 2022-08-04
202 정부, 규제해소·자유확대 첫걸음 뗐다
최승노 / 2022-08-04
최승노 2022-08-04
201 고유가·고환율 물가 안정은 어떻게?
황상현 / 2022-07-27
황상현 2022-07-27
200 성큼 다가온 에너지 안보 시대
조성봉 / 2022-07-26
조성봉 2022-07-26
199 정부 먼저 허리띠 졸라매자
최승노 / 2022-07-14
최승노 2022-07-14
198 중대재해처벌법이 위헌인 이유
한석훈 / 2022-07-06
한석훈 2022-07-06
197 손 놓은 연금개혁, 청년들은 불안
전서일 / 2022-07-06
전서일 2022-07-06
196 심야 택시전쟁, 공급막는 규제 풀어야 해소
최승노 / 2022-07-04
최승노 2022-07-04
195 반시장적 국회 입법폭주, 경제친화적 규제완화 법안으로 전환해야
곽은경 / 2022-06-27
곽은경 2022-06-27
194 학생·학교의 선택권 보장, 열린교육의 첫걸음
최승노 / 2022-06-21
최승노 2022-06-21
193 과도한 임금인상은 기업·개인 모두에
최승노 / 2022-06-13
최승노 2022-06-13