Deregulation key to reviving economy

최승노 / 2020-07-12 / 조회: 11,783       The Korea Times

People have high hopes and expectations for the 21st National Assembly which kicked off its four-year term May 30. For their part, lawmakers must be feeling a heavy sense of responsibility when considering how best to represent the interests of their constituents.


In this regard, members of the Assembly have shown a willingness to work hard for the people and the nation by actively engaging in the legislation process.


They need to avoid the mistakes committed by the members of the 20th National Assembly who invited criticism for not working hard. Yet, one might be surprised to know that the previous Assembly passed 8,904 bills in its term.


If the work of parliament is judged solely by the number of bills it passed, the 20th Assembly could have been seen as the hardest working ever in the history of Korean legislature. Then why are the people deeming the 20th as one of the most ineffective and negligent?


Let's look at the present situation in Korea. The economy is going downhill, and society is becoming polarized. Not to mention how chaotic the markets are. Blaming the current economic catastrophe only on COVID-19 is way too convenient.


It is undeniable that the coronavirus outbreak has had a devastating impact on economic vitality. The very root of the Korean economy has been impacted by its structural defects. People should realize that the economy had already been weakened well before the COVID-19 outbreak.


Employment has hit rock bottom ― the worst since the Asian financial crisis battered Korea in 1997. The gap between real growth and potential growth rates has widened steadily and continuously. Uncertainties and volatility have increased as the real economy has suffered.


To find the right solution for these problems, we need to make a precise and accurate diagnosis of the situation. It is no different for the case in which the economy is damaged. Without facing up to reality, there can be no good or appropriate policy to solve the problems at hand.


The number of bills the Assembly passed only portrays how both the government and the ruling party are obsessed with the idea of solving every problem by legislation. What we need is not a greater number of bills, but an Assembly which will push for market-friendly legislation to revive the economy and stabilize people's incomes.


Most of all, it is important to revitalize the private sector by deregulation. Korea is a stringent regulatory state in which restrictions and controls are in place all over the country.


The "Start-up Korea" report released by the Asan Nanum Foundation clearly shows the reality of all-pervading regulations in Korea.


The report states, "... more than half of the 100 most successful startups around the globe would be illegal if they set foot in Korea, due to heavy regulations enforced on enterprises and even major business opportunities." It is disheartening to realize how many jobs and opportunities have disappeared because of dull and outdated regulations.


The Product Market Regulation Index issued by the OECD put Korea's figure at 1.69. It is fifth among the 34 member countries. Not to disappoint the evaluation, the 20th National Assembly managed to table more than 1,200 regulatory bills in 2019 alone.


A somewhat unexpected bipartisanship "performed" to pass a bill banning the ride-hailing service Tada is a key example of such regulatory stiffness the 20th Assembly exhibited.


The 21st Assembly has to be different. Without easing off the grip on the veins of our economy, it is impossible to find any means to revive our economy under immense pressure.


Positive regulations outline economic activities that corporate entities are "allowed" to do. On the other hand, negative regulations outline "what not to do" and allow the rest. What we need is more of the latter than the former.


Regulations in the capital and its surrounding regions, such as those on plant locations, are the archetypes of regulations that have been in place for years. Especially in this given condition under COVID-19, medical and digital contactless industries are primary targets for deregulation.


Welfare coupons may guarantee temporary yet vanishing satisfaction. Such measures may be necessary in these challenging times. What the economy needs is an insight set for the future and policies to back it up.


Policies are to make way for the future, not to hold on to the past and drag the present down. Those may not take effect instantly. Time and patience are the key. Such a stance and action are vital in bringing prosperity and stability back into people's lives over the long term.


Abolishing regulations clogging investment and employment in various parts of our economy are of absolute urgency. We need a legislature which can pass a meaningful bill to oil the market and bring prosperity, not one tossing around meaningless bills just to stack up the numbers.


Choi Sung-no is president of the Center for Free Enterprise.

       

▲ TOP

NO. 제 목 글쓴이 등록일자
105 주인 없는 기업은 위험하다
최승노 / 2020-06-24
최승노 2020-06-24
104 검찰수사심의위 존재의 이유 `방어권` 삼성만 예외 아니길
최완진 / 2020-06-24
최완진 2020-06-24
103 코로나19 대응 양적완화 정책 성공하려면
김동헌 / 2020-06-17
김동헌 2020-06-17
102 How COVID-19 changes our perspectives on environment protection
곽은경 / 2020-06-14
곽은경 2020-06-14
101 `검찰 기소는 억지` 이미 다 밝혀졌다
김이석 / 2020-06-10
김이석 2020-06-10
100 21대 국회, 경제 살리기 먼저
최승노 / 2020-06-08
최승노 2020-06-08
99 포스트 코로나 시대에도 개인의 자유는 지켜져야
곽은경 / 2020-06-08
곽은경 2020-06-08
98 삼성바이오 재판에 담겨 있는 불편한 진실
곽은경 / 2020-06-03
곽은경 2020-06-03
97 `별건수사` 조국은 안되고 삼성바이오는 해도 되나
전삼현 / 2020-05-27
전삼현 2020-05-27
96 기업 투자 자발성 보장해야 `포스트 코로나` 살길 찾는다
설윤 / 2020-05-20
설윤 2020-05-20
95 삼성의 운명을 위헌 조직에?...지배구조는 기업 선택이다
양준모 / 2020-05-13
양준모 2020-05-13
94 고용보험 확대, 보험료 부담은 누가하나
최승노 / 2020-05-06
최승노 2020-05-06
93 `삼바 재판` 외눈 뜨면 `상속 분식` ... 두눈 뜨면 `이익 실현`
허희영 / 2020-05-06
허희영 2020-05-06
92 코로나가 환경보호 시각 바꿔놓았다
곽은경 / 2020-05-05
곽은경 2020-05-05
91 전자상거래 키우려면 규제부터 풀어라
박재민 / 2020-05-01
박재민 2020-05-01