Property right is vital in the functioning of market economy; without the guarantee of the right to property, the idea of market economy cannot be established. However, the government is now performing a conjoint attack with the media on property rights ― with all kinds of taxes and regulations. This phenomenon is at best dismantling the very base of the market economy, and plainly wrong.
The current real estate policies are misled with the wrong understanding of what it means to buy and sell houses. To stabilize the real estate price is basically to stabilize the market itself. Nevertheless, the rhetoric of house "pricing" deluded the government.
It eventually had the government and its policies lose their grip on the basic principle of stabilizing the housing "market" itself. Price which has been formed under the natural balance between supply and demand were then artificially manipulated. It only triggered greater chaos in not only the market but also the price which was the origin of the delusion.
House price can never be the target. Stability in the market can only be achieved through natural balance between the supply and demand. The results that participants in the market can eventually benefit from and be satisfied with, are possible so. Yet, the government formed a strict boundary in which the supply and demand can be met.
Such unnatural force pushed and pulled the unwilling buyers and sellers in the market, stirring up even greater instability. Instability then transcends into vulnerability and changeability in the market and its participants. Through such course, real estate policies brought about diverse balloon effects and unnecessary competition in the pricing within the market.
What is required now is to reduce the margin of doubt in the price and stabilize housing prices. Quality housing should be supplied into the market across the country, not only in Seoul. Rather than suppressing inevitable demand forcefully, timely supply to meet the demand in existence is a sound policy-making and governance.
The chaos of late in the house market is founded upon an irony. The government and its policies are based on misinterpretation of speculators and lack of supply in housing. If the former were in effect and to be handled, demands for speculations should have been diversified in other regions outside of the Seoul.
If the latter, extra supply of housing in regions of greater price should have been in action. Nevertheless, what the government chose was to press down the existing demand and pump in unwanted supply. This hastened the influx of speculators and getting an affordable housing in Seoul has now become near fantasy.
Seoul is a megacity with half of the nation's population in and out of it. Many jobs in both public and private sector are circled around it. Invisible yet immense value of the region cannot be simply reduced to "single adequate price." Blaming speculators for the rise of pricing in the market is a wrong decision and scapegoating.
If the government were serious to put down the price, reasonable and sound real estate policies based on the full understanding of such reality should have been in place. However, intellectual laziness and a sense of moral superiority had them demonize people wanting to make home in Seoul, which had all the means and reasons to attract them.
If stabilized and rational real estate price is to be achieved, excessive regulations in the market are to be removed and policies in coordination with market principles should be introduced. Supply should be met in regions of higher demand with good quality. Only through such policy direction and its effect, real estate market can function in a way to better our lives.
This is the direct opposite of what the government is currently pursuing, but people in demands and their needs can only be satisfied and met with the total shift of attitude and action. Government should step out of long delusion of controlling and picking out speculators out of the market. Experimentalism and obsession with regulatory schemes have already proven themselves wrong a long time ago.
Wrong policies coming from wrong diagnosis can never produce a meaningful result. Demonizing residence in Seoul in turn resulted in the rise of price in Seoul housing market. Conflicts and envies were worsened in such atmosphere.
Only the supply of affordable quality housing can be a solution to this chaos. Having to worry about the residence all the time can never be a fruitful and prosperous life. Real estate should be a mean to catalyze products of good quality into the market continuously, which will eventually make people's lives more stable and happier.
Choi Sung-no is president of the Center for Free Enterprise.
NO. | 제 목 | ![]() |
글쓴이 | 등록일자 |
---|---|---|---|---|
324 | [브릿지 칼럼] 연금개혁 방향 틀어야 최승노 / 2025-04-14 |
|||
323 | [안재욱 칼럼] 보이지 않게 富를 파괴하는 상속세 안재욱 / 2025-04-14 |
|||
322 | 토지거래허가제 재지정, 이대로 괜찮은가 최승노 / 2025-04-09 |
|||
321 | 플랫폼 기업에 대한 과도한 규제를 우려한다 최승노 / 2025-03-10 |
|||
320 | ‘가족회사 선관위’는 개혁 영순위다 안재욱 / 2025-03-09 |
|||
319 | 주택 공급 부족, 과도한 규제부터 점검하자 최승노 / 2025-02-27 |
|||
318 | 환경보호와 경제성장 함께 가야 최승노 / 2025-02-04 |
|||
317 | 대한민국, 새해 복 많이 받기를… 안재욱 / 2025-02-02 |
|||
316 | 노동개혁 없이 한국경제 미래 없다 최승노 / 2025-01-23 |
|||
315 | 어떤 정부가 좋은 정부인가 최승노 / 2024-12-29 |
|||
314 | 자해 정치, 자해 경제정책 안재욱 / 2024-12-23 |
|||
313 | 상법 개정안의 어두운 그림자 최승노 / 2024-12-05 |
|||
312 | 무리한 정년연장 법제화는 안돼 최승노 / 2024-11-26 |
|||
311 | 금리인하로 경제를 살릴 수 있다는 ‘착각의 경제학’ 안재욱 / 2024-11-24 |
|||
310 | [시장경제칼럼] 이제는 청년과의 동반성장을 모색해야 할 때 곽은경 / 2024-11-04 |